The minor buzz over at the UIUC revolves around the thrice-damaged signs protesting the Chief outside of the Native American House.

Teresa Ramos, whom the TASSers over at the DI can count upon at anytime to up the anglophobia quota, is back again at the News-Gazette (miraculously somehow promoted in ONE MONTH from Graduate student in her first letter to a PhD student) frothing over what she falsely asserts a lack of university response for the damage. As if a Phony hate-studies Doctorate (commonly known as a "PhD") in the Department of Fantasy-Academics (commonly known as "anthropology"), is not enough to raise some ears, her connection to ex-chancellor Nancy Cantor should be. In fact Cantor makes up part of the external advisory board of her pseudo-intellectual "diversity" undertaking prior to her exile from U-C. It seems, that the sigh of relief the populace had breathed after she was gone, was premature.

If Ramos had bothered to momentarily cease her banshee impressions and read something besides her own post-modern screed, she would have seen that police had offered security cameras set up to monitor the displays. And in good UofI fashion, the university decided to do the opposite of the most obvious course of action and decline.

As one poster for the above story asked, we join them as the most basic of all questions: why?
The university has in no way shown that it has any scruple for wasting money, so it does not seem likely that they will start now. How ironic that the NAH would not wish utilize tools best to catch the perpetrators.

Lest we forget, this is the same NAH, that on several occasions has attempted to stifle free speech (for good or for ill), which lauds itself for engaging in racist actions like painting faces black (which Ramos herself condemned!). Therefore, we can in no way discount the possibility that an organization that has engaged in conduct such as its previous skulduggery, would stoop to sabotaging their own display to rally support and accuse their opponents.

Before the temptation to accuse us Hounds of chasing black cars (we are Hounds, we do not do helicopters), it may wise to remember that this type of tactic is not unusual in a indocdiversity-laden institutions. Perhaps Kerri Dunn can vouch for this?

Posted by Hound No. 3