The DI tells Global Campus to DIE?

Nothing could have prepared us for last week's editorial in the DI. Amidst the usual nonsensical, hate-filled screed of Paul Cruise, the DI launched a blistering critique of the Global Campus 2.0 (at least the zero seems appropriate). After taking a moment to purvey some of the statements of this article, it becomes twice as incredulous that the DI wrote this. For example:

"...the program has fallen flat on its face."

"Even President White said, 'What we ought to do is reset the approach we were taking and learn from the last couple of years what has worked. And let’s go with what has worked and eliminate what hasn’t.'
'Go with what has worked and eliminate what hasn’t'? What hasn’t worked has been the entire program. It’s time to face the truth"

"And what we pick and what we choose should be for the best of our University as a whole, and that
would not be Global Campus."

The DI, as we have posted previously, had been ardent shills of the skunk White and his machinations for quite a while. Indeed, the DI had advertising links to the office of GC until their new format. Also, White's less-than-honest manner in the killing of Chief Illiniwek gained him unconditional TASSer loyalty from the DI.

For other reasons as well, this long-overdue development is not nearly enough to reverse the DI sycophants' standings as TASSers. The revelation about DeBrock came several weeks too late after the News Gazette's, and naturally makes no mention of his shady past. It does mention Ghosh in the past tense, but nothing surrounding his quest to take care of the "too many jar heads" nor his suspicious departure.

Posted by Hound No. 9

Charting a Course

Over at Critical Mass, Erin O'Conner has a great post on charter schools in response to a column by David Brooks. We will not post much on that here, as one can read it easily enough at the linked site.

CM makes an amazing statement after the Brooks quotes while listing
the numerous faults of the present education setup:

"School choice and high standards work. We should stop arguing about it, and start doing it. It's the most decadent, arrogant form of waste to argue against it--it steals kids' futures for the sake of adults' partisan politics in the present.

FWIW: The year I spent teaching at a boarding school was a sharp and clear lesson in what kids respond to and what doesn't work for them. The school was hobbled by a rigid adherence to certain progressive practices and beliefs -- as in, no grades (just supportive report letters); no emphasis on basics such as spelling and grammar (because that might turn kids off); no tracking of any kind (because egalitarian mediocrity that served no one was preferable to the comparisons kids might draw if some were allowed to excel).

The most striking point in the quote describes the "egalitarian mediocrity" which permeates like some virulent miasma within our primary education system. Aye, several of us remember in our Obedience School where dogs could not learn new tricks-it would be unfair to those who were sub par.

In other noteworthy events, Chapin Rose had grilled skunk for breakfast last week during a question and answer session with skunk White. White is trying to cast aside criticism of his new (but hardly improved) version of the Global Campus 2.0. Panelists for coming up with a way to sidestep scrutiny of the failed program have made comments including by the co-chair "The proposed initiative would never run at a deficit." (not true unless the UI considers an excess of $3 million does not qualify as a deficit) to "We owe Global Campus a debt" (sort of true-as far as emphasis on "debt"). Watching White squirm under the examination makes us wonder whether in future if he will adopt the Glen Poshard method of alleviating scrutiny and criticism, as he has already once attempted to make himself arbiter of IL law in a move that only Palpatine could approve of, by undertaking ethics policy that should be left to lawmakers.

Posted by Alpha Hound